A Meshline Altar deployment: an upside-down obelisk fixture suspended above an operator console in a sovereign data hall.
The Knowledge-Base OS

Six layers.
One memory. Built for sovereign deployments.

Meshline is not a search index, a chatbot, or a wrapper around a foreign API. It is the substrate beneath all three: a permission-aware evidence graph that knows what your organization knows, who is allowed to know it, and what just changed.

01 · DIAGNOSIS· THE STATE OF ENTERPRISE KNOWLEDGE

Every enterprise generates an unbroken stream of decisions, documents, signals and conversations. None of it is connected. None of it is queryable. None of it is alive.

Your organization knows everything.
It just can't remember.

A 10,000-person enterprise produces, on average, ~6 petabytes of internal knowledge per year, scattered across thirty-plus systems, locked behind incompatible permissions, decaying inside private channels and personal drives.

Search retrieves documents. Document AI summarizes them. Neither knows what the company decided last Tuesday, who contradicted whom in the architecture review, or which strategic initiative quietly drifted off-mission six months ago.

The decision is in a Slack thread.
The reasoning is in a Google doc. The contradiction is in an email. The supporting evidence is in a Figma comment from June.
The expert left the company.
Their working knowledge left with them. Their replacement spends six months reconstructing context that was never written down.
The audit asks a single question.
Twelve people spend three weeks finding the answer. The answer turns out to be wrong.
FIG.01 · DISCONNECTED SOURCE TOPOLOGYPRE-INGESTION
Confluence
142,308 pages
Notion
38,420 docs
Slack
4.2M messages
Microsoft 365
912,400 emails
Drive
380,914 files
SharePoint
74,228 sites
Salesforce
186,452 records
Linear / Jira
38,118 issues
Figma
24,500 frames
GitHub
1,402 repos
× NO COMMON SCHEMA× NO LINEAGE× NO PERMISSIONS GRAPH× NO TIME AXIS

CAPTION: The same fact appears in seven different systems under seven different schemas. A meeting decision contradicts a Slack thread that contradicts a Confluence page. No one notices.

02 · TRANSFORMATION· FROM SCATTERED FILES TO STANDARDIZED MEMORY

Meshline does not search your data. It rebuilds it, into a permission-aware graph of evidence-grounded claims, decisions, entities and relationships.

The difference is not incremental.
It is structural.

BEFORE · RAW SOURCE STATE
T = 0
SLACK"i think we agreed to drop the v3 plan?"
EMAILRE: budget"see attached, ignore the previous"
NOTIONOKR_Q3_FINAL_v2_actually_FINAL.md
CONFLUENCEStrategy 2024 (last edited 11 months ago)
DRIVEmeeting_notes_lkjs8a.docx
JIRATIK-2241 · description: "see Slack"
CRMAccount: ACME, owner left 8mo ago
TEAMSPM: "did Sarah ever circle back on this?"
× UNINDEXED× UNCITED× UNTRACKED× UNGOVERNED
AFTER · MESHLINE MEMORY GRAPH
T = +1 INGEST CYCLE
DECISIONDrop v3 product line
7 sources cited
CONTRADICTIONOKR Q3 vs Board memo Apr-09
3 sources cited
RISKMission drift, Initiative #14
11 sources cited
KNOWLEDGEACME account context
64 sources cited
✓ INDEXED✓ CITED✓ VERSIONED✓ PERMISSION-AWARE
OUTCOME · 01

From files → to facts.

Every document, message and decision is parsed into evidence-grounded claims with source-level lineage.

OUTCOME · 02

From keyword search → to context.

Queries return synthesized answers with full provenance, not ten ranked links you have to read.

OUTCOME · 03

From dead archives → to live memory.

New evidence updates existing claims. Contradictions surface. Stale beliefs are flagged automatically.

03 · ARCHITECTURE· THE STACK

Every layer is auditable. Every layer is governable. The Memory Interface Layer is the proprietary core, delivered through direct engagement with each customer.

Six layers.
One that never has to leave your premises.
One that we built ourselves.

FIG.02 · MESHLINE REFERENCE STACKPER-CLIENT DEPLOYMENT
L06

Application Surface

WhatsApp · Slack · Email · Teams · Web · Voice · Custom Agents

A single memory powers every channel. Executives query the company. Employees query their work. Auditors query the trail.

L05

Context Kernel

Stateful · Permission-aware · Delta-injected

The kernel mediates every interaction. Agents never see raw memory. They receive permission-filtered, deduplicated context packets compiled to a token budget.

L04

Memory Interface Layer

LOCKED
PROPRIETARY · LICENSED PER DEPLOYMENT

The graph substrate and the snapshot system, custom-built for memory workloads. This is the layer that makes the rest possible.

L03

Standardization Pipeline

Modality-native · Provenance-preserving

Documents → layout-grounded extraction. Audio → transcripts + speaker + acoustic events. Video → tracks + scenes + masks. Code → AST + symbol graph. Every observation cites its source coordinates.

L02

Crawler & Ontology Engine

Frontier model · model-agnostic gateway

A frontier-class model surveys the corpus, discovers domain concepts, resolves entities, induces relations and proposes the ontology, dynamically, from your data, never templated.

L01

Source Connectors & Evidence Vault

Confluence · Notion · Slack · Drive · CCTV · IoT

Immutable, hash-addressed originals. Permissions inherited verbatim from source systems. Every byte versioned, every access audited.

FOUNDATION · SOVEREIGN TIERAir-gapped Linux · Sovereign GPU substrate · Hardware HSM-backed RBAC

Three principles
non-negotiable.

PRINCIPLE · 01
Evidence over embeddings.
Every claim Meshline produces is grounded to source coordinates, page, paragraph, frame, timestamp. Embeddings retrieve candidates. Coordinates prove truth.
PRINCIPLE · 02
Permissions inherit, always.
A derived summary, tag or graph edge cannot be more permissive than the source it was extracted from. RBAC propagates through every transformation, automatically.
PRINCIPLE · 03
The agent never sees memory.
Agents request context from the kernel. The kernel decides what to surface. No agent ever has direct read access to the graph, the vault or the source systems.
10 · IP· THE MEMORY INTERFACE LAYER

Meshline’s commercial moat is not a model. It is the layer between the model and the data: the ingestion pipeline, the custom graph substrate, the context kernel. We deliver it through direct engagement with each customer.

The proprietary core.
Delivered through engagement.

MIL · ISOLATED VIEWPROPRIETARY
  1. L1 · Object store
    Files, blobs, mailflow, recordings
  2. L2 · Lakehouse
    Iceberg / Parquet, columnar truth
  3. L3 · Search + vector
    Lexical, semantic, hybrid recall
  4. L4 · Graph topology
    Entities, relations, lineage
  5. L5 · Context kernel
    Stateful, permission-aware activation
SCHEMATIC ABSTRACTED · INTERNAL DETAILS WITHHELD
MIL · 01

Custom graph substrate

Built for memory workloads, not generic graph queries. Hot activation, snapshot reuse, pointer-based context delivery. Faster than off-the-shelf graph databases because it is not a graph database. It is a memory system that uses graph topology.

MIL · 02

Multi-pass crawler

Six deterministic passes plus continuous incremental ingest. Modality decomposition, ontology induction, entity resolution, claim extraction. Driven by a frontier model behind a model-agnostic gateway. Tunable to the customer's domain.

MIL · 03

Stateful context kernel

Tracks every active session's pointer set, suppresses duplicate context, compiles delta packets to a token budget, and enforces permission inheritance at the edge of every interaction.

MIL · 04

Snapshot system

Pre-computed, queryable memory capsules, by entity, project, person, time window. The kernel can stand up working context for any question in milliseconds, not minutes.

COMMERCIAL POSTURE

Today, Meshline is delivered through direct engagement with each customer, sized to corpus, integrated to source systems, hardened to deployment posture. The Memory Interface Layer is the persistent core that travels across every engagement.A productized form for mid-market enterprise is on the roadmap. The sovereign tier remains scoped per customer.

05 · INGESTION· WHY THE CRAWL MATTERS

Meshline's crawler is a six-pass cold-start that turns raw, disordered enterprise data into a typed, contextual ontology. It runs once on your corpus, then continuously on every new artifact.

A knowledge graph is only as honest
as the model that built it.

PASS 0

Source preservation

Every byte hashed. Every file versioned. Every permission inherited. No intelligence yet, just an immutable, audit-grade record of the company's reality.

PASS 1

Modality decomposition

Documents become layout-grounded blocks. Audio becomes diarized transcripts plus acoustic events. Video becomes tracks, masks, scenes. Code becomes symbol graphs. Reality is preserved in modality-native form.

PASS 2

Ontology discovery

A frontier-class model surveys the corpus and discovers what the company actually is, its products, its people, its risks, its acronyms, its decisions in flight. Tags are not assigned. They are induced.

PASS 3

Entity resolution

Aliases like "Project X", "X Inc.", "the startup", "the new initiative" all resolve into canonical entities, with confidence, aliases, evidence pointers and unresolved alternatives preserved.

PASS 4

Concept graph induction

Relations are proposed, validated, and materialized. The ontology is dynamic but governed: nothing enters the graph without provenance and confidence.

PASS 5

Activation snapshots

Pre-computed memory capsules: by project, person, customer, time window, domain. The kernel can stand up working context for any question in milliseconds.

FIG.03 · WHY LOCAL FRONTIERSOVEREIGN TIER · RUN PROFILE
The corpus contains everything.
Strategy. Personnel. Counsel. Pending acquisitions. For a corpus like this, sending every byte to an unvetted third-party API is not "best practice." It is the reason the sovereign tier exists.
The crawl reads it all.
Six passes touch every byte. The model that runs the passes is reached through a model-agnostic gateway; in the sovereign tier it is hosted inside the perimeter, physically, legally, contractually.
The crawl is heavy.
Ontology induction at enterprise scale demands frontier-class capability. A 70B local model is not enough. The crawl needs serious GPU substrate to converge in days, not months.
The crawl never stops.
New documents, messages and events arrive every second. Continuous crawling is the price of a knowledge graph that stays current.
CONSEQUENCE
A serious knowledge graph requires a serious local model.
A serious local model requires serious local infrastructure.
This is the room.
UNIVERSAL INGESTION

Every source the organization already pays for, reduced to one memory.

Multi-pass ingestion converts files, threads, tickets and recordings into evidence-grounded claims with source-level lineage. Permissions are inherited from the source. The kernel re-derives on every change.

SOURCE SYSTEMS32+ CONNECTED
  • Outlook
  • Gmail
  • Proton Mail
  • Google Drive
  • OneDrive
  • Box
  • Dropbox
  • Slack
  • Microsoft Teams
  • Discord
  • Telegram
  • WhatsApp
  • Signal
  • Notion
  • Confluence
  • Google Docs
  • Jira
  • Linear
  • Asana
  • GitHub
  • GitLab
  • Bitbucket
  • ChatGPT
  • Claude
  • Gemini
  • Salesforce
  • HubSpot
  • Google Calendar
  • Zoom
  • Google Meet
  • Grafana
  • Datadog
+ recordings · CCTV · IoT · datastores · APIs
MESHLINE KERNELSOVEREIGN TIER · ON CUSTOMER HARDWARE
DecisionsEntitiesContradictionsLineageRisk eventsCitations
PERMISSION-AWARE · CITED · RE-DERIVED ON CHANGE
07 · SURFACES· WHAT THE EXECUTIVE OFFICE GETS

One memory, many surfaces. Each is permission-aware, evidence-grounded, and continuously running. Each can be silent (surfacing only what passes the threshold) or active, on demand.

The Company Strategizer.
And five experiences around it.

COMPANY STRATEGIZER

A silent strategist that runs continuously.

The Strategizer ingests every new artefact the moment it lands and maintains a live, bird's-eye view of priorities, risks, customers, vendors, projects and mission drift. It connects dots no human reviewer has time to connect, and surfaces them only when they pass a confidence and importance threshold the executive office controls.

RUNS CONTINUOUSLY
Ingest, standardize, link: every artefact, the moment it lands
Surface only what crosses the importance threshold
Audit-grade lineage on every output
COMPANY PULSE

What changed this week.

A weekly synthesis of new evidence, decisions, and shifts across every source the organization runs on.

MISSION DRIFT

Where strategy and execution diverge.

Continuous comparison of stated strategy against operational reality. Drift is named, sourced, and ranked by impact.

INCONSISTENCY RADAR

Contradictions across teams.

Surfaces the policy on page 14 that contradicts the Slack thread that contradicts the OKR doc, with full lineage.

DECISION LINEAGE

How was this decision actually made?

Reconstruct any decision from the source artefacts: who proposed, who approved, what was overruled, what changed.

BOARD BRIEFING GENERATOR

Cited briefings produced from the live corpus.

A weekly executive memo with citations, contradictions, and confidence, generated from the working memory itself.

REACHES THE COMPANY THROUGH

The same memory, exposed through the channels people already use, with permissions inherited from the originating system, never weakened.

Web cockpitMicrosoft TeamsSlackEmailVoiceWhatsApp (within policy)
SOVEREIGN TIER · DEPLOYMENT POSTURE

On your hardware. In your facility. Under your law.

09 · GOVERNANCE· SOVEREIGNTY · GUARANTEES SCOPED PER TIER

Strategy. M&A. Personnel records. Counsel correspondence. Operational telemetry. The data that defines an organization demands explicit, auditable guarantees. Meshline scopes them to three deployment tiers; in the sovereign tier, nothing leaves the perimeter.

The crown jewels get a perimeter,
not a promise.

GOV-01SOVEREIGN TIER

Everything inside the perimeter

In the sovereign tier, nothing leaves the perimeter: no data egress, no outbound model calls, no silent telemetry. Hardware you own, in facilities you control, on networks you operate.

GOV-02REQUIRED

Permission inheritance

Every derived asset (summary, embedding, graph edge, entity record) inherits the access policy of the source it was extracted from. RBAC is propagated, not bolted on.

GOV-03REQUIRED

Hash-addressed evidence

Every byte of source data is hash-addressed and versioned. Tampering is detectable. Lineage is provable. Every model output can be traced to its evidentiary source coordinates.

GOV-04REQUIRED

Mediated agent access

No agent has direct read access to the graph, the vault or the source systems. Agents request context. The kernel decides what, if anything, to reveal.

GOV-05REQUIRED

Immutable audit log

Every query, every retrieval, every model invocation is logged to an append-only store. Regulator-grade transparency. No retroactive edits possible.

GOV-06PER TIER

Model-agnostic gateway

The multi-pass crawler reaches frontier-class models through a model-agnostic gateway: a model hosted inside your perimeter, a zero data retention endpoint, or any API you approve. In the sovereign tier, weights, prompts and outputs never leave the deployment.

DEPLOYMENT TIERS

Three tiers. One governance spec.

Permission inheritance, hash-addressed evidence and the audit ledger ship in every tier. The perimeter is the variable you choose.

TIER 01
SOVEREIGN ON-PREM

Everything inside the perimeter. Zero egress.

TIER 02
ZDR API

Inference through a zero data retention API.

TIER 03
MESHLINE CLOUD

Managed by Meshline, governed by your policies.

SOVEREIGN TIER · REFERENCE POSTUREOn your hardware. In your facility. Under your law.
JURISDICTION
Customer-defined
ENCRYPTION
Customer-managed keys (HSM)
KEY ROTATION
Air-gapped ceremony
NETWORK POSTURE
Air-gapped or hybrid
AUDITABILITY
Regulator-grade
EXPORT CONTROL
Customer-controlled
08 · OUTCOMES· WHAT THE EXECUTIVE TEAM ACTUALLY GETS

Meshline does not replace any system the organization already runs. It sits beneath them, making the entire stack queryable, accountable and alive.

The output is not a chatbot.
It is institutional consciousness.

· 01 ·

A bird's-eye view of the company.

A single, queryable picture of every active project, decision, risk and contradiction, synthesized live from every source the organization runs on. The board sees what is happening, not what was last reported.

SURFACES
Executive Console · Board Briefing · Live Pulse
· 02 ·

A silent agent, always running.

A continuous background process correlates new evidence against the existing graph. It surfaces inconsistencies, mission drift, contradictions and stale beliefs the moment they appear, to the people authorized to act on them.

SURFACES
Daily Brief · Drift Monitor · Contradiction Queue
· 03 ·

Every channel. One memory.

WhatsApp. Slack. Microsoft Teams. Email. Voice. A custom app. Every interface routes to the same kernel, the same governance, the same evidence-grounded answer. No channel sees more than its user is permitted.

SURFACES
Slack · Teams · WhatsApp · Email · Voice · API
· 04 ·

A chain of custody on every answer.

Every model output is a traceable claim. Click a sentence, see the source paragraph, the timestamp, the author, the version, the chain of derivation. Auditable by counsel, regulators and the security team alike.

SURFACES
Evidence Viewer · Audit Console · Lineage Explorer

Architectural reasoning, not vendor claims.

01 · INVARIANTS· THE FOUR DESIGN-TIME GUARANTEES

Performance numbers vary by corpus, by hardware, by ontology. These four do not. They are architectural constants, fixed at design time, by construction.

The numbers that don't move
across deployments.

INVARIANT · 01
0
data egress in sovereign deployments

In sovereign deployments, no model API calls leave the perimeter: no silent telemetry, no vendor-side weights, and the frontier model that runs the crawl is hosted locally. ZDR and Meshline cloud tiers are available.

INVARIANT · 02
100%
evidence-cited model output

Every claim is grounded to source coordinates, page, paragraph, frame, timestamp. Claims without lineage are not produced.

INVARIANT · 03
10⁹+
edges in graph (per deployment)

Deployment-scale graph topology. Sized to the customer's corpus, the customer's ontology, the customer's pace of change.

INVARIANT · 04
1:1
permission inheritance from source

A derived summary, embedding, graph edge or entity record can never be more permissive than the source it was extracted from.

02 · LANDSCAPE· THE RETRIEVAL ARCHITECTURE STRAWMAN

Pure RAG, pure vector, pure graph, pure cache: each fails under sovereign-enterprise load. Meshline is the layered composition that survives the constraints all of them violate.

No single component is sufficient.
The composition is the answer.

APPROACH
ARCHITECTURE
FAILS WHEN…
SOVEREIGN
01
Pure RAG
Chunk text · embed · retrieve top-k by similarity
Decisions cross documents. Permissions matter. Corpus exceeds 100k items. Same fact appears under seven schemas.
No
02
CAG (cache-augmented)
Pre-load full corpus into the prompt context
Corpus is bigger than the context window. Updates invalidate the cache constantly. Token cost balloons; signal-to-noise collapses.
No
03
Vector-only
Pure embedding similarity over chunks or entities
Provenance is required. Entities collide in embedding space. Contradictions silently rank similar to corroborations.
No
04
Pure graph
Graph DB as primary store; documents are blobs
Petabyte-scale text and media must live somewhere queryable. Graphs alone cannot do full-text retrieval at corpus scale.
No
05
Lakehouse-only
Iceberg / Parquet + analytics engines
Low-latency activation is required for live agents. Analytical query plans are not interactive at p95 < 50ms.
No
06
Evidence-kernel
, Meshline
Object store · lakehouse · search/vector · graph topology · stateful context kernel
Designed for this case.
Yes

· Meshline does not replace any of these components. It composes them through a proprietary kernel that decides what to activate, what to cite, and what to suppress. The graph is one layer. The vector store is one layer. The lakehouse is one layer. The kernel is the answer.

03 · COST CURVE· HOW THIS BREAKS

Below ~10,000 entries, every retrieval strategy looks fine. The curves diverge as the corpus grows. This is the single chart that explains why naive RAG fails at sovereign-enterprise scale, and why a kernel that emits deltas, rather than retrieved sets, is the only architecture that holds.

The same query, the same answer.
A different cost curve.

FIG.05 · TOKEN COST AGAINST CORPUS SIZESHAPE · ILLUSTRATIVE
1k10k100k1M10M+CORPUS · ENTRIEShighmidlowTOKEN COST · PER QUERYBREAKSHOLDS
Naive RAG / CAG
Context budget exhausted
Token cost grows super-linearly
Vector + re-rank
Holds initially, then drifts
Provenance + permissions still bolt-on
Meshline · evidence kernel
Approximately flat
Kernel emits deltas, not the full set
READING
Curve shapes are illustrative of asymptotic behavior, not promised numbers. Methodology, the underlying corpus configurations and the p50/p95/p99 distributions are shared in the discovery call.
05 · METHOD· WHY THIS IS NOT RAG

Retrieval-augmented generation pulls text fragments. Meshline reconstructs the underlying object: the decision, the entity, the contradiction, the lineage. The difference shows up the moment a question matters.

RAG was built for documents.
Enterprises run on decisions.

01Unit of retrieval

Text chunks

02Cross-document context

Lost: chunks are independent

03Permission model

Bolt-on filters, often leaky

04Source citation

Approximate: chunk ID

05Behavior on contradictions

Returns both, ranked by similarity

06Behavior on stale data

Treats stale and current as equal

07Token cost at 100k entries

Balloons exponentially

08Auditability

You audit the prompt

09Failure mode

Hallucinates plausibly

VERDICTUNRESOLVED
For 100 documents,
RAG is fine. Use it.
For 100,000 evolving artifacts,
RAG cannot cite, deduplicate, or detect drift. Meshline is built for this.
For sensitive, sovereign data,
Hosted RAG cannot enter the perimeter. Meshline ships a sovereign tier that runs entirely inside it, with ZDR and cloud tiers available.
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A · THE GRAPH-DB LANDSCAPESeven engines. Different jobs. Meshline does not bind to one.
04 · ENGINES· THE GRAPH-DB LANDSCAPE

Sovereign enterprise memory has three workloads: hot activation under millisecond latency, distributed analytics over the full graph, and embedded snapshots at the edge. Each calls for a different engine. The Memory Interface Layer is what abstracts the choice.

Seven engines. Different jobs.
Meshline does not bind to one.

Neo4j

BASELINE / DEBUG SURFACE
STRENGTH

Mature ecosystem, Cypher, strongest tooling, best visualizations.

WEAKNESS

Not the fastest at distributed scale; vector + full-text are layered on rather than first-class.

Memgraph

PRIMARY HOT-ACTIVATION GRAPH
STRENGTH

In-memory C/C++ engine, Cypher-compatible, built-in vector and text indexes, fast multi-hop traversal.

WEAKNESS

Younger ecosystem than Neo4j; community-edition licensing requires review for redistribution.

FalkorDB

HIGH-THROUGHPUT ACTIVATION
STRENGTH

GraphBLAS sparse-matrix backend; the RedisGraph successor. Exceptional read-heavy traversal latency.

WEAKNESS

SSPL license requires legal review for OEM deployments; ecosystem is narrower.

TigerGraph

MASSIVE DISTRIBUTED GRAPH
STRENGTH

Audited LDBC SNB BI results at scale; serious distributed graph analytics.

WEAKNESS

Operationally heavier; overkill for single-tenant memory at most enterprise sizes.

GraphScope (Apache)

CLUSTER ANALYTICS
STRENGTH

Apache-2.0; audited LDBC interactive results; designed for cluster-scale graph analytics.

WEAKNESS

Less ergonomic for hot serving than Memgraph or FalkorDB.

Kuzu

EMBEDDED SNAPSHOTS
STRENGTH

Embedded architecture, columnar storage, interesting performance characteristics.

WEAKNESS

Original repository archived October 2025; production use depends on fork ecosystem.

Amazon Neptune

CLOUD-PREM ONLY
STRENGTH

Managed AWS, supports Gremlin and SPARQL, integrates with the AWS data plane.

WEAKNESS

Full-text search depends on OpenSearch integration. Disqualified for air-gapped sovereign deployments by virtue of being managed cloud.

ENGINEERING POSTURE

One memory. Many engines underneath.

Different deployments choose different engines based on the customer\'s posture, sovereignty, scale, ecosystem, license. The Memory Interface Layer presents a stable graph contract; what runs underneath is a deployment decision, made jointly with the customer's security and platform teams.

APPENDIX B · INSTRUMENTATIONThe numbers we measure. Sized to your corpus.
06 · INSTRUMENTATION· ACTIVATION METRICS · PERMISSION FIDELITY

Performance numbers are deployment-specific. The structure of what we measure is constant across every install. Numbers are produced from the customer's own corpus during phase 0 and travel with the methodology brief that explains them.

The numbers we measure.
Sized to your corpus.

ACTIVATION METRICSp50 / p95 / p99 across deployment classes
  • Cold-start ingest convergence
    Time from connector enable until the first answerable query.
  • Snapshot-hit context build (p50)
    Median context-packet latency when the active snapshot covers the query.
  • Cold-pass context build (p95)
    95th-percentile latency when the kernel has to build context from cold storage.
  • RAG vector-search baseline (p95)
    Side-by-side latency for a vanilla vector retrieve over the same corpus.
  • Token cost @ 100k entries (delta)
    Per-query LLM cost compared to a vector + re-rank baseline at 100k entries.
PERMISSION FIDELITYBehavior on permission-leak scenarios
SCENARIOMESHLINERAG + POST-HOC FILTER
Source file moved between folderspreserves source ACL on derived assetsleaks via the embedded vector
RBAC group renamed at sourcepropagates within the next ingest cyclerequires re-embedding the corpus
Source permission revoked retroactivelyderived assets become inaccessible immediatelyderived chunks remain queryable
Cross-tenant query attempt (multi-tenant deploy)blocked at the kernel boundarydepends on filter correctness
Audit reconstruction over 12 monthslineage chain is queryable end-to-endno lineage by design
METHODOLOGY

Numbers come from your corpus, with the methodology that explains them.

We do not publish portable benchmarks. Each customer receives the full p50/p95/p99 distribution measured on their corpus, the configuration that produced those numbers, and the explicit bounds within which Meshline will, and will not, commit to a number.

06 · DEPLOYMENT· THE ALTAR · SOVEREIGN INTELLIGENCE CHAMBER

When the data is sovereign, the machine has to be sovereign too. The Altar is the physical embodiment of Meshline: a purpose-built room that houses the company's living memory.

A room you can walk into.
A memory that never leaves it.

THE OBELISK · CENTERPIECESUSPENDED · APEX-DOWN
7b1d…03e9a9f2…c41e4c8a…f217d31e…88b00f6c…2a9d9e44…b7c261b0…d4f3e8a7…5c01
CHAMBER TYPE · TIER-II / IIIFIG.06

CAPTION: The obelisk is the visible control plane: live ingestion, memory activation, audit telemetry. The compute and storage substrate sits adjacent, behind glass, in the Vault.

REFERENCE BUILD · SPECIFICATIONCONFIGURED PER CLIENT
Compute substrate
GB200 / GB300 NVL72-class · or HGX B200 pilot tier
Storage
Hot all-flash 250–500 TB · Object evidence vault 1–2 PB · immutable backup
Networking
Quantum-X800 / 400–800 GbE · air-gapped management plane
Power
250–500 kVA UPS · N+1 generator · liquid-cooled CDU
Identity
HSM-backed RBAC · OIDC + SAML · audit log to immutable store
Surface
Curved LED wall · transparent OLED · operator stations · obelisk
TIER · I

Pilot Altar

Software pilot on contained hardware

Proves the Memory OS, ingestion, RBAC and exec UX. Hardware sized for one department, one corpus. Suitable for a 12–16 week prototype.

SCOPE
Configured per client
FLAGSHIP
TIER · II

Sovereign Intelligence Chamber

The iconic Altar Room

Full obelisk centerpiece, command wall, separated Vault. HGX B200 / H200-class compute. The visual flagship for an executive deployment.

SCOPE
Configured per client
TIER · III

AI Factory

GB200 / GB300 NVL72-class substrate

Rack-scale liquid cooling. Multi-rack fabric. Full disaster-recovery topology. Sovereign inference factory plus full Memory OS at organizational scale.

SCOPE
Configured per client
NEXT

Read three live deployments. Or initiate a briefing.